Showing posts with label fractures in metals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fractures in metals. Show all posts

Monday, March 14, 2011

Griffith's Theroy: Mechanism of Brittle Fracture



      It has been observed that the stress required for a material, at which it fractures, is only a small fraction of cohesive strength. This discrepancy led Griffith to suggest that the low observed strengths were due to presence of micro-cracks, which act as the points of stress concentration. 

       According to the Griffith's criterion. the crack will propagate under the effect of a constant applied stress if an incremental increase in length produces no change in total energy of the systems. Mathematically the above criterion is explained as 
C = \sqrt{\cfrac{2E\gamma}{\pi}}


A proper explanation of the above theory is given as below by Wikipedia:

Fracture mechanics was developed during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, A. A. Griffith, to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith's work was motivated by two contradictory facts:
  • The stress needed to fracture bulk glass is around 100 MPa (15,000 psi).
  • The theoretical stress needed for breaking atomic bonds is approximately 10,000 MPa (1,500,000 psi).
        A theory was needed to reconcile these conflicting observations. Also, experiments on glass fibers that Griffith himself conducted suggested that the fracture stress increases as the fiber diameter decreases. Hence the uniaxial tensile strength, which had been used extensively to predict material failure before Griffith, could not be a specimen-independent material property. Griffith suggested that the low fracture strength observed in experiments, as well as the size-dependence of strength, was due to the presence of microscopic flaws in the bulk material.

      To verify the flaw hypothesis, Griffith introduced an artificial flaw in his experimental specimens. The artificial flaw was in the form of a surface crack which was much larger than other flaws in a specimen. The experiments showed that the product of the square root of the flaw length (a) and the stress at fracture (σf) was nearly constant, which is expressed by the equation:
\sigma_f\sqrt{a} \approx C
An explanation of this relation in terms of linear elasticity theory is problematic. Linear elasticity theory predicts that stress (and hence the strain) at the tip of a sharp flaw in a linear elastic material is infinite. To avoid that problem, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach to explain the relation that he observed.

      The growth of a crack requires the creation of two new surfaces and hence an increase in the surface energy. Griffith found an expression for the constant C in terms of the surface energy of the crack by solving the elasticity problem of a finite crack in an elastic plate. Briefly, the approach was:
  • Compute the potential energy stored in a perfect specimen under an uni-axial tensile load.
  • Fix the boundary so that the applied load does no work and then introduce a crack into the specimen. The crack relaxes the stress and hence reduces the elastic energy near the crack faces. On the other hand, the crack increases the total surface energy of the specimen.
  • Compute the change in the free energy (surface energy − elastic energy) as a function of the crack length. Failure occurs when the free energy attains a peak value at a critical crack length, beyond which the free energy decreases by increasing the crack length, i.e. by causing fracture. Using this procedure, Griffith found that
C = \sqrt{\cfrac{2E\gamma}{\pi}}
where E is the Young's modulus of the material and γ is the surface energy density of the material. Assuming Eγ = 1 J/m2 gives excellent agreement of Griffith's predicted fracture stress with experimental results for glass. = 62 GPa and




The above information is taken from Wikipedia. Please do refer to them for more info. Don't forget to review this copy of Material Science and Engineering book, which has info for all the syllabus of AMIE material science.

with warm regards
AllMyPosts

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Brittle Fracture

In brittle fracture, no apparent plastic deformation takes place before fracture. In brittle crystalline materials, fracture can occur by cleavage as the result of tensile stress acting normal to crystallographic planes with low bonding (cleavage planes). In amorphous solids, by contrast, the lack of a crystalline structure results in a conchoidal fracture, with cracks proceeding normal to the applied tension.

The theoretical strength of a crystalline material is (roughly)
\sigma_\mathrm{theoretical} = \sqrt{ \frac{E \gamma}{r_o} }
where: -
E is the Young's modulus of the material,
γ is the surface energy, and
ro is the equilibrium distance between atomic centers.
On the other hand, a crack introduces a stress concentration modeled by
\sigma_\mathrm{elliptical\ crack} = \sigma_\mathrm{applied}(1 + 2 \sqrt{ \frac{a}{\rho}}) = 2 \sigma_\mathrm{applied} \sqrt{\frac{a}{\rho}} (For sharp cracks)
where: -
σapplied is the loading stress,
a is half the length of the crack, and
ρ is the radius of curvature at the crack tip.
Putting these two equations together, we get
\sigma_\mathrm{fracture} = \sqrt{ \frac{E \gamma \rho}{4 a r_o}}.
Looking closely, we can see that sharp cracks (small ρ) and large defects (large a) both lower the fracture strength of the material.

Recently, scientists have discovered supersonic fracture, the phenomenon of crack motion faster than the speed of sound in a material. This phenomenon was recently also verified by experiment of fracture in rubber-like materials.

The above info is taken from Wikipedia and from www.ubstech.com. Please do refer to the same for further info.


Don't forget to grab a copy of Material Science and Engineering book, which is essential for preparing for AMIE, Material Science.
with warm reagards
AllMyPosts

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Brittle Fracture VS Ductile Fracture

Brittle Fracture:
    • Caused due to high impact blows on the material
    • Plastic deformation is zero or very very less
    • Once crack is formed,  the crack is unstable in nature and propagates very rapidly.
    • Crack propagates nearly perpendicular to the direction of the applied stress
    • Crack often propagates by cleavage - breaking of atomic bonds along specific crystallographic planes (cleavage planes).
Ductile Fracture:
    • Caused due to tensile forces acting on the material
    • Necking can be observed i.e. excessive plastic deformation takes place
    • Crack is stable i.e. once crack is formed, it resists propagation unless further stress is applied
    • Micro-voids are formed fist, then by shear forces the crack propagates and results in fracture
Good material about about Fractures is available here & here


Don't forget to grab a copy of Material Science and Engineering book, which is essential for preparing for AMIE, Material Science.

with warm regards
AllMyPosts
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...